Veise VE017 vs VE027: Gateway or Direct Wi-Fi?
Automated research by Top10Scout editorial team · Not hands-on tested · Last verified 2026-10-05
Published · Updated
We may earn a commission through purchase links, at no extra cost to you.
Choose VE027 for a new remote-access setup when avoiding a separate gateway is useful; keep VE017 when its existing gateway and KK Home routine already work. Both offer fingerprint entry and use the same named app. The main buying difference is how the lock reaches your home network, with a different battery requirement to include in the ownership decision.
What changes in the complete installation?
What changes in daily use
| Decision | Veise VE017 | Veise VE027 |
|---|---|---|
| Remote connection | Bluetooth (built-in) · Remote control via Veise G1 Gateway (sold separately, requires 2.4GHz Wi-Fi) | Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi (no hub required) |
| Entry methods | Fingerprint · App (KK Home) · Keypad PIN · Key fob · Physical key · Voice control (Alexa / Google) · Code sharing | Fingerprint · App · Keypad PIN · Key fob · Physical key · Voice control (Alexa / Google) · Code sharing |
| Management app | KK Home App (iOS & Android) | KK Home App (iOS & Android) |
| Required batteries | 4 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries (not included) | 8 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries (not included) |
| Emergency power | Type-C port (temporary unlock only) | Type-C port (temporary unlock only) |
VE017 uses built-in Bluetooth and the separately purchased Veise G1 gateway for remote operation. VE027 lists built-in Wi-Fi without a hub requirement for that connection. For a first installation, removing a powered accessory can simplify where the equipment lives.
That is useful when there is no convenient place for a gateway near the door. It is less valuable when VE017 already has a satisfactory gateway arrangement. Compare the system you need to install, not just the number of boxes shown beside the lock.
Does direct Wi-Fi make the lock better for every user?
It makes the remote connection more self-contained. A person who regularly manages access from away may prefer that arrangement for a new door. Check the actual Wi-Fi conditions at the door rather than assuming a signal elsewhere in the house proves the final position is suitable.
For someone who primarily uses a keypad, card or fingerprint at home, remote connectivity may not be the deciding feature. Buy it when checking status or managing access from outside is a real part of the routine.
An existing G1 gateway is a purchase already made, not a cost every VE017 owner must pay again. Replacing a working lock solely to remove an accessory may create more setup work than it saves. Choose VE027 when the current arrangement causes a recurring inconvenience or the new door would otherwise require another gateway.
Are fingerprints or the app a reason to upgrade?
Both models list fingerprint entry, and both identify KK Home as the management app. Do not count either shared feature as an exclusive VE027 benefit. If those are the reasons you wanted a smart lock, compare the complete current packages before paying for a different connection method.
The shared app name also does not prove automatic migration. After any replacement, verify the authorized users, codes and intended access behavior on the actual new lock. A familiar interface is helpful, but the permissions still deserve deliberate checking.
For guests, decide whether access should recur or expire after a visit. The useful system is one the administrator can keep accurate. It is not necessarily the system with the highest headline count of unlocking methods.
What changes in power and backup entry?
VE017 lists 4 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries (not included); VE027 lists 8 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries (not included). That is a real difference in the required cells, not proof that either lock lasts longer. Include the correct batteries and a replacement routine rather than comparing conditional endurance claims as though they came from the same test.
Both document a Type-C port for temporary unlocking power. That is an emergency-entry aid, not a claim that the installed AA batteries can be recharged through the lock. A physical key remains another available entry method on both.
For a new purchase, choose VE027 when its direct connection simplifies the intended remote setup. For an owner with satisfactory VE017 access, keep it unless that network change solves a real problem. Also check the deadbolt dimensions, door alignment and selected finish before ordering. We have compared the official setup and feature requirements, not tested network reliability or fingerprint recognition.
What are the checked package prices?
The checked Veise US lock-only references are $69.99 for VE017 and $89.99 for VE027, both in Matte Black. The listed difference is $20.00. The VE027 retailer buying option is Satin Nickel, so confirm that finish’s own current price rather than treating this Matte Black reference as its quote. The VE017 gateway route can require an additional purchase, so this is not the complete remote-control setup difference. Tax, shipping and promotions can change checkout totals.
Which prices are being compared?
These are separate listed hardware reference prices from Veise US store and Veise direct store. The displayed difference is not a delivered checkout saving; tax, shipping, promotions and package details can differ.
Starting remote management from scratch
Choose VE027 when the direct Wi-Fi arrangement fits the door and avoids placing a new gateway. Compare complete installed costs, including the listed batteries.
VE017 plus G1 already works reliably
Keep it when there is no missing daily function. Fingerprint access and KK Home are already present; replacing the lock needs a stronger reason than gaining them again.
Frequently asked questions
Which gateway does VE017 need for remote control?
Its checked specification names Veise G1. Gateway families should not be substituted because the brand is the same. Match the accessory to the exact lock model, and keep the remote-control prerequisite separate from local Bluetooth access.
Do both locks support fingerprint entry?
Yes. Both official entry-method lists include fingerprints along with other methods. VE027’s main distinction in this comparison is direct Wi-Fi, rather than adding fingerprint access that VE017 did not already provide.
Does the Type-C port recharge the AA batteries?
The official specifications describe temporary unlocking power. Treat it as an emergency way to operate the lock, not as charging the installed AA cells. Maintain the batteries and a practical backup entry method separately.
Is VE027 automatically worth replacing VE017?
No. If the existing gateway and access routine work, keep the current lock. VE027 is more compelling for a new remote setup or when removing the gateway solves an actual placement or administration problem.
Official sources
Veise VE017: checked exact-model source and conditions — checked 2026-10-05
Veise VE027: checked exact-model source and conditions — checked 2026-10-05